Rand Paul stopped by the Late Show with David Letterman on the 24th of February to promote some book that only like 10 people will actually read. During the interview, Dave took his usual dumb stance as interviewer in order to fish out positions from his guest. In this case it was the Tea Party and Republican stance on public funding of institutions and how to handle dis-functioning systems. While the interview has now ‘a-ha’ moment that can be pointed to, what you see in the interview is a public official exposing himself to his true interests in service.
Letterman, states quite bluntly of the embarrassment of the public school system without addressing a specific reason. (Personally, I feel it’s the automatic tenure teachers receive as opposed the teachers unions as a whole) Rand Paul believes that while that is might be important, it is in his better interest to cut funding for these public servants in the interest of tax relief for people that have time to worry about an effective tax rate. He stated as much, pointing out that the top 1% pay for the largest portion of tax revenues in the country and they should. From a mathematical point of view someone making $10 million a year will send more money to the government than someone making $40,000. However it is misleading to say they are contributing more than their share because the percentage of earning that actual dollar amount is calculated on is so much larger. It’s like saying there was a 200% rise in the enrollment of the NJ KKK, but in actual number terms it means the group went from 1 person to 3 people. The static, on its own is impressive, but the utility of the number is missing so there is no reference for the statistic.
Do not be mislead by a number that Rand Paul or other wealthy conservative individuals point out. They are speaking from their own self interest and to the parties that they represent without consideration for the larger community. Kudos to Messier Letterman for being able to flesh this out of a slick politician and to the rest of us, please consider your self-interest and the communities issues when thinking about voting for people like this. They are a wolf in sheep’s clothing looking to ravage the things we have put together for their own with no interest in consequences.



